Autonomous system
AS10540 INFODOOR
Unclassified
Summary
InfoDOOR Pty Ltd
legacy
An obscure Australian holder. Pty Ltd is the Australian proprietary-limited company form, and the address space is all early APNIC allocation, so the country is well grounded even though the company itself leaves almost no public trace.
What it's used for
Honestly: not determinable from the evidence, and this card will not guess. RIS sees 6 announced IPv4 prefixes carrying 4,608 addresses, no IPv6, and one observed neighbour. The blocks are 202.47.8.0/22, 202.6.8.0/22, 58.145.180.0/22 and three /23s alongside them. No PTRs came back on the addresses sampled, which is a sample and not a finding, so it supports no conclusion either way.
What can be said is that the inventory is internally consistent. Every prefix is APNIC space in the ranges historically handed to Australian networks, and 202.0.0.0/8 in particular is among the oldest space APNIC ever issued. There is no scatter across multiple registries, no third-party-looking registration, nothing that resembles the address-leasing shape. This looks like a single long-standing Australian holder still announcing the blocks it was given, through one upstream.
Notable
The single observed neighbour rules out any wholesale or transit role. A network with 4,608 addresses could be a small ISP, a hosting operation or a large enterprise, and the difference matters, so the classification here is deliberately left open rather than invented. The company name suggests an internet business; the routing does not confirm which kind, and a name is not evidence.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| ZA | South Africa | 6 |
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere