asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS10489 ARMOUR-AS

Hosting ARIN

IPv4 addresses 2.05K 1 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Armour Cloud, LLC

United States · AI-generated

ARMOUR-AS belongs to Armour Cloud, LLC, a small cloud-hosting, colocation and virtual-desktop provider operating out of a Phoenix, Arizona data centre. The company sells secure VDI, managed IT and rack space; its registered business address is a suite number in Peoria, AZ, with the machines themselves in Phoenix.

What it's used for

Hosting third-party workloads. RIS sees 9 announced IPv4 prefixes covering 2,304 addresses, all of them /24s inside 209.250.0.0/20 (209.250.0.0/24 through 209.250.7.0/24, plus 209.250.15.0/24). No IPv6 is announced, and 1 neighbour is observed — a single-homed hosting island, not a carrier.

Notable

The kind is hosting, and the reverse DNS says something sharper about what is hosted. Sampled PTRs read prd-bd-2F1N9N.cleamyemaillist.com, prd-bd-YO47O1.fastemailcleaner.com, prd-bd-SFAH69.emaillistinsight.com, prd-bd-WG8HMP.cleancontactlist.com, prd-bd-SP85HP.emailopeninsight.com, alongside mx1.mysupersales.com.

That is one naming template — prd-bd- plus a random six-character token — spread across half a dozen different second-level domains, all of them email-list-hygiene or email-marketing brands. A single operator generating hostnames from one script while rotating the domain underneath them is the working shape of high-volume outbound email infrastructure, and public abuse-reporting services have flagged addresses in this range.

Interesting

Nothing in the rDNS resembles the VDI or colocation business the operator advertises. When the marketing and the inventory disagree, believe the inventory: whatever else Armour Cloud sells, the space it actually announces is dominated by bulk-mail senders, so addresses here should be treated as server space with mail-sending reputation risk, never as end users.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
Ninja-IX PhoenixPhoenix, United States206.41.105.30

Transit providers

1 upstream, 0 downstream and 1 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS20454SECURED SERVERS LLC472

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-22, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 1 prefixes · 2.05K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America1

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS10489
Registry name
ARMOUR-AS
Registrant
Armour Cloud, LLC
Abuse contact
admin@armourcloud.io
Registered
1997-08-26
Last changed
2022-11-17
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 8 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
8 authorising AS10489
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 8 of 8 announcements
Route objects
18 naming AS10489

Reputation

Classification and threat

Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,779 prefixes, as published 2026-10-23. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check