asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS10104 BVKCOMPUTER-AS-AP BV K Computer

Unclassified APNIC

IPv4 addresses 0 0 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 4 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly LA
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

BV K Computer

Laos · AI-generated

BVKCOMPUTER-AS-AP is registered with APNIC to BV K Computer, at an address in Sisawat village, Chanthaburi District, Vientiane, Laos. It is a low-numbered, long-held AS whose current use is much harder to pin down than its registration.

What it's used for

Whatever it is doing today, it is doing it entirely over IPv6. The AS announces no IPv4 prefixes at all and just 4 IPv6 prefixes — 2001:df3:6c40::/48 from APNIC, and 2a12:f8c0:2100::/40, 2a12:f8c0:2000::/48 and 2a12:f8c1::/48 from RIPE NCC space. An APNIC member in Laos originating RIPE-region IPv6 is not itself wrong, but it does mean the address space and the registrant sit in different registries, so the holder's Lao address is a poor guide to where the addresses actually land.

Notable

The 3 observed BGP neighbours are the most informative fact here, and they are not carriers: the observed upstreams are small hosting and VPS networks rather than a national transit provider. A network reached through budget hosting AS paths, announcing only IPv6, with no v4 footprint, is not an eyeball ISP and not an enterprise estate. It looks like a small operator or hobbyist-scale network using VPS-based BGP transit.

Interesting

Held as other with low confidence deliberately. The registrant is legible, the use is not, and the routing gives no basis to geolocate these prefixes to Vientiane.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 0 downstream and 2 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS56655Gigahost AS39
AS53667FranTech Solutions38

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 0 prefixes · 0 addresses IPv6 4 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
LALao People's Democratic Republic4

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS10104
Registry name
BVKCOMPUTER-AS-AP
Registrant
BV K Computer
Abuse contact
abuse@dodorama.com
Registered
2024-02-09
Last changed
2024-02-09
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
BV K Computer
Scope
Not Disclosed
Traffic ratio
Not Disclosed

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 2 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
4 authorising AS10104
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 2 of 2 announcements
Route objects
6 naming AS10104

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check