asn.dev

Observed topology

AS1002 BYTEFILTER-AS

Upstreams 6 carry this network
Downstreams 5 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 12
Adjacent (IPv6) 0

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS1002: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS13335Cloudflare, Inc.HostingIPv4290
AS60068Datacamp LimitedHostingIPv4131
AS137409GSL Networks Pty LTDUnclassifiedIPv463
AS35133Eranium B.V.HostingIPv461
AS32097WholeSale Internet, Inc.HostingIPv457
AS30456Cosmic Global NetworksUnclassifiedIPv436

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS1002 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS22951Hebergement Phaonix Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4122
AS204248Edgar Torres LlaveroUnclassifiedIPv462
AS400724EZProvider Networks, Inc.UnclassifiedIPv461
AS53902Fluxorus NetworksUnclassifiedIPv436
AS216013Caleb Bonner Trading as Papyrus VIPUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

12 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS1002 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS60068Datacamp LimitedHostingIPv4314
AS13335Cloudflare, Inc.HostingIPv4290
AS137409GSL Networks Pty LTDUnclassifiedIPv4224
AS22951Hebergement Phaonix Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4122
AS204248Edgar Torres LlaveroUnclassifiedIPv462
AS397032SPARKED HOST LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS400724EZProvider Networks, Inc.UnclassifiedIPv461
AS35133Eranium B.V.HostingIPv461
AS32097WholeSale Internet, Inc.HostingIPv457
AS53902Fluxorus NetworksUnclassifiedIPv436
AS30456Cosmic Global NetworksUnclassifiedIPv436
AS216013Caleb Bonner Trading as Papyrus VIPUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS1002, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 2 exchanges across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Seattle Internet ExchangeSeattle, United States206.81.81.201350
Kansas City Internet ExchangeKansas City, United States206.51.7.21072

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.